"tengu_log_datadog_events": false,
人 民 网 版 权 所 有 ，未 经 书 面 授 权 禁 止 使 用
。heLLoword翻译官方下载对此有专业解读
I learned that for 4-SAT, if clause to variable ratio is more than 10, the generated problems become difficult to solve, and the likelihood of formula to be SAT or UNSAT is close to 50%. So I generated 3 types of formulas:
（二）已满十六周岁不满十八周岁，初次违反治安管理的；。WPS官方版本下载是该领域的重要参考
It’s a bit more manual than the 1Password approach — you maintain the mapping in the script rather than a reference file — but it works without any third-party dependencies.
Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.，更多细节参见heLLoword翻译官方下载